At a moment like the present, a comparison between the revolution and counter-revolution in Russia, between the period of revolutionary onslaught (1905) and that of counter-revolutionary playing with a constitution (1906 and 1907) suggests itself as a matter of course. Such a comparison is silent in any attempt to define a policy-making line for the immediate future. Contrasting errors of the revolution or revolutionary illusions with positive constitutional work is the keynote of present-day political literature. The Cadets shout well-nigh it at their pre-election meetings.
The liberal press chants, howls, and rants about it. We pose here Mr. Struve, vehemently and spite largey venting his nuisance on the revolutionaries because hopes of a compromise have totally collapsed. We have here Milyukov, who, for all his mincing manners and Jesuitism, has been forced by events to arrive at the clear,accurate andabove alltruthful rumor: the enemies are on the left. We have here publicists in the vein of Tovarishch, such as Kuskova, Smirnov, Plekhanov, Gorn, Yordansky, Cherevanin, and others who denounce the October-December struggle as folly, and more or less openly  advocate a democratic coalition with the Cadets. The real...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .



0 comments:
Post a Comment